Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 07:59:36 11/11/97
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 1997 at 09:29:35, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 10, 1997 at 22:01:54, Robert Sherman wrote: >>> >>I am impressed that Crafty steers itself out of trouble. But a >>seven-point swing for a computer program based on positional safety of >>the king is incredible. It certainly makes that Deep Blue Be4 move >>totally normal because computer programs were only a point or two >>different. Your score is 7-8 points different from all the commercial >>programs that I have seen. > >I am re-running this and will post the results soon. A couple of >points, >however... > >1. I do *not* have king-safety terms that cause a +/- 7 pawn swing. :) I do. Regularly :) Chris Whittington > >2. I might have posted bogus analysis. I get hung up with position >learning >about once per month. While annotating, position learning is disabled, >but I >played around with this game before doing the annotate, and it is highly >likely >that Crafty "learned" something along the way that screwed the scores up >at >this point in the game. > >I will post a new annotated game in a few mins to see how it looks after >the >position.bin file has been deleted from my notebook...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.