Author: blass uri
Date: 06:39:44 07/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2000 at 09:09:02, Frank Wolf wrote: >I read some of the posts on this question and sit back and laugh. Any real >chess player who has played many games of chess with computers KNOWS THERE IS A >BIG DIFFERENCE between chess programs with respect to human style. Talk of >scientific proof of this is as silly as trying to prove that the great painters >created works of art. THE COMPUTER STYLE IS TO PLAY TO OPEN THE POSITION AT >EVERY OPPORTUNITY AND WIN BY BRUTE FORCE TACTICS ALONE! You are wrong. Deep Junior drew against adams in a closed position. There is no attention >paid to bad bishops, knight outposts, pawn structure chess, etc. You are wrong again. Any class A or >better player can spot the difference. I think that I am not worse than class A rating(I suppose that class A rating is not better than 2000 fide rating and I cannot see that computers know nothing about these things) Hiarcs 7.32 is more human-like than >Junior 6, Junior 6 is more human-like than Fritz 6, Fritz 6 is more human-like >than Fritz 5, Fritz 5 is more human-like than Fritz 4. > >It's great to have the programmers giving input on this site, but they should >confine their comments to what they know, programming issues! When they start >talking about chess, they look as silly as I would if I started giving posts >about computer chess programming. Sorry but I do not believe that the programmers know nothing about chess. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.