Author: blass uri
Date: 08:46:03 07/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2000 at 10:55:07, Francesco Di Tolla wrote: >On July 14, 2000 at 09:48:06, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>What puzzles me is that Anand didn't go for the Stonewall that Kramnik >>played yesterday. He could have done it, but instead the game became open >>and dangerous. > >Anand is a gentlemen, may be he did not like the idea to copycat Kramnik's game, >after all it would have been inelegant, since they know the computer will play >the same most probably, since learning is not triggered by a single event. I do not agree. I do not believe the programmer will allow Junior to lose in the same way. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.