Author: blass uri
Date: 10:55:23 07/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2000 at 09:29:13, Chris Carson wrote: >. Explanation: Deep Junior is commercial and the players got a version that is almost the same and can produce almost all the moves in the games. Kasparov could not buy something that produce most of the moves of Deep blue,so the result of Deep Junior is better even if Deep Junior's performance is slightly lower than the performance of Deep Blue(96). I also believe that Deep Junior is better than Deeper Blue if you assume the same number of nodes per second(It means that Deep Junior is 50-100 times faster). I believe that the quality of the knowledge in the evaluation function of Deep Junior is better than the quality of the knowledge of Deeper blue's evaluation function. It is possible that Deeper Blue had more knowledge but the quality of knowledge is important and not the quantity. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.