Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered!

Author: Jerry Adams

Date: 16:28:16 07/14/00

Go up one level in this thread

On July 14, 2000 at 19:00:32, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On July 14, 2000 at 18:40:10, Drazen Marovic wrote:
>
>>  Scientifically is a comp GM strength?  According to some here no, though i'm
>>not convinced of that oppinion either.
>
>Science has nothing to do with opinion. There's not enough statistical evidence
>to support the Junior GM claim and that's it. But by all means, take a vote.
>Then Junior would be a democratic GM instead of an actual GM. I would vote for
>it, if it had a built-in espresso machine. Sadly, it doesn't.
>
>Best wishes...
>Mogens


 Your ideals and opinions are basically stupid, obviously no international
master could have such a Score as Deep Jr. did in such a Strong GM tournament !!
You people defy belief!!

• Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered! Alvaro Polo 00:36:20 07/15/00
• Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered! Dann Corbit 16:35:03 07/14/00
  • Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered! Jerry Adams 17:29:34 07/14/00
    • Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered! Pete Galati 17:35:35 07/14/00
      • Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered! Jerry Adams 17:42:59 07/14/00
        • Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered! Pete Galati 18:03:06 07/14/00
        • Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered! Mogens Larsen 18:00:04 07/14/00

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.