Author: Pete Galati
Date: 16:42:08 07/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2000 at 19:24:31, Jerry Adams wrote: >On July 14, 2000 at 16:17:17, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: > >>On July 14, 2000 at 14:27:05, Jerry Adams wrote: >> >>>Is Deep junior Grandmaster strength? >> >>If your intention is to read a lot of posts about why a computer program is GM >>strength or not I suggest you look at the CCC archives instead. >> >>If you think that the last tourney proved the claim you make with your >>rethorical question state so in your topic so that everyone knows he can ignore >>this message. >> >>Thanks. > > > Please control your imagination, I think it is assholish to reply to a direct >question with all types of speculation about what may or may not be intended. >How do you come to the conclusion that my question is rhetorical?? It sounds to >me like you are 100% positive that Deep jr is GM Strength, since you find my >question to be obnoxious, Obviously Dann Corbit doesn't agree with you, although >my question was to neither you or Dann, ofcourse I know you both are the types >that can't resist adding your two cents when no one was speaking to you in the >first place! But as Dann noted "If the message is only to one person, then use email." If this is a question that you'd like only Bob to give input on, then you don't want to ask the question in a forum where several people will see it and respond to it. If you email him, make sure you you up the spelling on his name btw. Now for my 2 cents, since this is a forum. Grandmaster is a title. If I had played a few games that could be concidered GM strength (I didn't btw) then that would by no means make me GM strength, it would only mean that I played a few good games. Same thing with the computer program Dp Junior. It wasn't enough games to win it a GM title, so it's not GM strength. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.