Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered!

Author: Pete Galati

Date: 17:35:35 07/14/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 14, 2000 at 20:29:34, Jerry Adams wrote:

>On July 14, 2000 at 19:35:03, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On July 14, 2000 at 19:28:16, Jerry Adams wrote:
>>
>>>On July 14, 2000 at 19:00:32, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 14, 2000 at 18:40:10, Drazen Marovic wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Scientifically is a comp GM strength?  According to some here no, though i'm
>>>>>not convinced of that oppinion either.
>>>>
>>>>Science has nothing to do with opinion. There's not enough statistical evidence
>>>>to support the Junior GM claim and that's it. But by all means, take a vote.
>>>>Then Junior would be a democratic GM instead of an actual GM. I would vote for
>>>>it, if it had a built-in espresso machine. Sadly, it doesn't.
>>>>
>>>>Best wishes...
>>>>Mogens
>>>
>>>
>>> Your ideals and opinions are basically stupid, obviously no international
>>>master could have such a Score as Deep Jr. did in such a Strong GM tournament !!
>>>You people defy belief!!
>>
>>Your ad-hominum attack shows that you have no sensible arguments and resort to
>>name calling.  Your lack of mathematical rigor is actually rather funny.
>>
>>Your failure to grasp the logical basis of his argument is even more hilarious.
>>
>>Note that Mogens nowhere claimed that Deep Junior is *not* of GM strength.
>>Rather, he simply stated that is has not been adequately proven.
>>He is absolutely correct.  And they may or may not be of GM strength.  The
>>question at hand is "Are they of GM strength or not?"  The answer at hand is
>>"Not enough data yet, according to the definition of the term 'GM' proposed by
>>FIDE."
>>
>>Will you follow up with another brilliant rejoinder rather than a logical
>>argument?
>>
>>To call Mogens stupid for understanding what you have completely failed to grasp
>>is absolutely hysterical irony.
>
>
>
> Dann I commend all your brilliant mathematical ideals, there is only one thing
>you lack with all your impressive logic....  common sense!!

If you continously attack CCC members like this, you'll bring out the
moderators.  Please try to behave a _little_ better.

Pete



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.