Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered!

Author: blass uri

Date: 23:30:19 07/14/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 15, 2000 at 02:13:57, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On July 15, 2000 at 01:59:21, Drazen Marovic wrote:
>>Listen I AM  a GM!!  and have probably been playing chess longer than you have
>>been alive i have played and beaten some of the best in the world when they were
>>the best.  I know something that you will never know, i KNOW what GM strength
>>is.  Since you don't know you really have no need to argue it is you who are
>>wrong.
>
>I won't argue that you are a better chess player than I will ever be, or even
>that you understand strength better than I do.  But suppose that DJ falls to
>stonewall by any chess expert.  Is it still a GM?

I think that GM's know that it is not so simple to win it by stonewall.
They have Junior and can play against it at home.

My opinion is that it may be not a GM strength against weaker players when the
target of them is to draw[it may get performance of only 2400 against 2200
players who play for a draw(remember that hasidovski that has less than 2200
drew 3 computers in the israeli league)] but I believe that it is a GM strength
against 2700 players because the only thing that it must do is not to lose
against them.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.