Author: Frank Wolf
Date: 06:54:56 07/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
Why in the world would I want to go to the time and trouble of generating a statistical analysis to provide evidence to support something that most strong chess players and I feel is obvious. Statitics are a weak method to resolve this issue because one can always challege the assumptions and parameters of the test. Do we use statistics to establish the value of works of art? Of course not! We use experts to judge the value of artistic creations. Most strong chess players with computer chess experience will accept the premise that there are differences in the "human-like" style of play of todays programs. Weak players will be oblivious to this issue.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.