Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:09:05 07/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2000 at 13:52:39, blass uri wrote: >On July 15, 2000 at 13:16:45, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >>On July 15, 2000 at 11:43:30, Daniel Chancey wrote: >> >>Hi, >> >>Junior made several mistakes: >> >>1. Closing the position >>2. Not playing Bh6 to exchange the black bishop >>3. The useless and time consuming bishop maneuver Bg5-e3-f4? >>4. Castling long, right into the black attack >>5. The lemon a2-a3??, which gives Black a nice target >> >>After 15 moves White was already desperate. You know, in these positions the >>strongest programs simply look silly, using a 4,5 GHz processor or not! The >>point is that calculating gets you nowhere in closed positions. Even a 5000 GHz >>processor wil not prevent moves like a2-a3? Because this move will not lose >>within the next 30 plies. >> >>It seems that programmers should have 2 versions of their program: >> >>1. A fast one to play other chess programs >>2. A much slower one with a lot more chess knowledge, that can prevent >> games like against Kramnik and Piket. > >I think that a better idea is to do only one slow program that can win other >programs by king attacks. > >Chess system tal often wins other programs by king attacks but the programmer >stopped to develop this program. > >You can download the games of the millenium tournament and see games that system >tal wins by king attack > >see http://homepages.compuserve.de/hjsxy/page4.html > >Uri Just don't conclude that it wins most of the games it plays...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.