Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Upon scientific truth - the nature of information

Author: Gareth McCaughan

Date: 15:17:15 07/15/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 15, 2000 at 17:41:54, ShaktiFire wrote:

> Dann , no offense, but though you enjoy
> logic games,  the more educated here find
> many of your argument incredulous, and simply
> cannot take the time to enlighten you in your
> thought processes.  But I see you are having
> alot of fun today. :-)

The more educated here? Would those be the ones
who know the difference between "incredulous"
and "incredible"? :-)

Seriously: I'm probably one of the more educated
people here, and I think Dann's arguments are
spot on. Perhaps my education is the wrong sort.
What sort of education would reveal that his
arguments are broken?

--
g



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.