Author: pete
Date: 16:11:44 07/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
>This may be so, but how much greater is a GM's knowledge really? Being >realistic and not worshipping the talented, that is. ;) It is immense I think . If you look at GM judgements of positions you often see even material , no forced things and the GM says : Black wins ! No prog can do this yet ( and be right most of the time :-) ) . I just remember a very famous position from Alekhine from Nottingham36 and the comments in tourney book , if interested I can search for it . I had an interesting experience once ; being about a 2100 player then ( far away now ;-) ) I played against an IM in team game , chose my favourite opening , reached my favourite type of position and was ( very ) happy . Some 40 moves later I lost . Interesting was post-mortem analysis ; I searched for my mistakes move per move and was critical with nearly every move I made . Opponent listened a little then explained to me :" Whole setup was wrong ! Position is passive allowing opponent to play with a clear plan without adequate counterplay !" I very rarely see moves or better _setups_ from computers I can't understand ; it seems most of their knowledge is near mine ; only they really go deep . I suspect though this is not enough until hardware improves to a point too deep for humans .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.