Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 15:22:12 11/11/97
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 1997 at 17:28:09, Rolf Tauschen wrote: >>I take this as a response that you intend to continue as before. > >Better ask others what they did and do. I wrote nothing about what I >intended and want to please others to stop the continuous stupid >insinuating of things I never said. But of course as I've said that is >seemingly not possible for some people... > >>As you wish. > >See above for lies like this. > >>No doubt you'll be expecting the comsequences. > >I survived law-suits, so I think I went through hotter stuff yet. Tough guy. > >>Chris Whittington > > >This is an example for postings which I thought impossible on CCC. >I observe since long that some people, among those also well-known >special agents of ccc, behave as if they had bought this group to behave >like drunken cowboys. With serious ad hominems etc. > >I will not copy this behaviour I don't believe you .... > but also want to beg the real >responsibles here of ccc to help me to be not a fair game for people >like the auther here quoted. Because if I used words like shit and >others (see the former post of the same author) then I surely would be >censored by the self-announced police. Nope. you might get censored for endlessly libeling and lie-ing and making conspiracy theories and perverting just about any thread on rgcc into your own brand of madness, and all but destroying our discussion forum on the net, and causing people to stop posting and just about anything you care to name. In short for being an anti-social maniac without redeeming features. Four-lettered anglo-saxonisms we can cope with; lies, venom and insanity get to be too much. > >But the police itself has the right to spread lies and ad hominems. >Look, on rgcc I wouldn't cry for help, because there I have my methods >to defend myself. Yes, we've seen those. Those 'methods' of yours. >The same here with the so-called shit I had thrown on >ES. Very funny. In reality it was this person who wrote to me that I was >a p__. yes, of course, how stupid of me. it was all Ed's doing, how could I not have seen that ? He attacked you, and you, poor thing just suffered while he kept on and on and on and on and on and ....... > >Again in rgcc I know how to handle this. Rant on. Those lucky rgcc-ers ..... > But here I thought such topics >were obsolete.... Bye bye Mr Tauschen ........ Go spit your venom on rgcc. Chris Whittington > > >Thanks for any reaction by Mr. Schwartz for instance.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.