Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 21:16:50 07/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2000 at 23:50:05, Pete Galati wrote: >On July 15, 2000 at 22:12:17, kurt wrote: > >>Kramniks win was not a miracle. Just hard work. >>Juniors loss was the fault of poor opening preparation. >>Playing against the "Reversed Dutch Stonewall" without >>an opening guidance against a GM looks impossible for >>any comp. engines to solve. It took many years for humans >>to find a proper responce with white colores against it. >>To avoid future exploitations of such glareingly week >>openings...engine owners work harder on "Book" to give >>your engines a better chance to keep winning against GM'S. >>Best regards, Kurt Widmann > >Only guessing, but I would imagine that Amir put a fair amount of effort into >the Stonewall sections of Junior's book. I'm sure that losses and draws are >very valuable to him actually. Orders of magnitude more valuable than a win. Err... Except for sales. Consumers will see little more than won/loss/draw.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.