Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 16:27:59 11/11/97
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 1997 at 19:06:12, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On November 11, 1997 at 18:22:12, Chris Whittington wrote: > >> >>On November 11, 1997 at 17:28:09, Rolf Tauschen wrote: >> >>>>I take this as a response that you intend to continue as before. >>> >>>Better ask others what they did and do. I wrote nothing about what I >>>intended and want to please others to stop the continuous stupid >>>insinuating of things I never said. But of course as I've said that is >>>seemingly not possible for some people... >>> >>>>As you wish. >>> >>>See above for lies like this. >>> >>>>No doubt you'll be expecting the comsequences. >>> >>>I survived law-suits, so I think I went through hotter stuff yet. >> >>Tough guy. >> >>> >>>>Chris Whittington >>> >>> >>>This is an example for postings which I thought impossible on CCC. >>>I observe since long that some people, among those also well-known >>>special agents of ccc, behave as if they had bought this group to behave >>>like drunken cowboys. With serious ad hominems etc. >>> >>>I will not copy this behaviour >> >>I don't believe you .... >> >>> but also want to beg the real >>>responsibles here of ccc to help me to be not a fair game for people >>>like the auther here quoted. Because if I used words like shit and >>>others (see the former post of the same author) then I surely would be >>>censored by the self-announced police. >> >>Nope. you might get censored for endlessly libeling and lie-ing and >>making conspiracy theories and perverting just about any thread on rgcc >>into your own brand of madness, and all but destroying our discussion >>forum on the net, and causing people to stop posting and just about >>anything you care to name. In short for being an anti-social maniac >>without redeeming features. > >I think it should be allowed to ask the ICD host if the ccc event was >planned to allow people like the quoted author to spread such stuff >without giving the attackerd a possibility to defend. Not that I wanted >to defended against such stupid and self-reveiling nonsense, but I think >in a serious technical cc related club this behaviour of W. shouldn't be >allowed. Again, I don't ask for the permission to answer him with the >same methods. But I want to know if this behaviour is tolerated here in >this club. > >However what would be the consequence of such aggressive nonsense? >Logically all of those who had pretended that they had to leave rgcc >cause of some very serious happenings now had to leave ccc too, no? I find Chris's way to address you in a prior message unacceptable by CCC standards. I hope I won't have the dubious honor of being the first moderator that acts as such in CCC. >Mr. Schwartz, please give me a comment from the official side. Note, >that I don't need your permission to strike back, because I can't take >Mr. W. for serious anyway, but did I have the same right to write ad >hominems? Writing ad hominem is what you are known for, your major contribution to the world of computer chess. Therefore I understand the difficulty someone may have addressing politely to you after your constant insults in RGCC. Don't expect many helping hands. If you want one you'll find it at the end of your arm. And since this thread is of no general interest, I would propose to put an end to it. Enrique >Thank you again. > >R. Tueschen > >> >>Four-lettered anglo-saxonisms we can cope with; lies, venom and insanity >>get to be too much. >> >>> >>>But the police itself has the right to spread lies and ad hominems. >>>Look, on rgcc I wouldn't cry for help, because there I have my methods >>>to defend myself. >> >>Yes, we've seen those. Those 'methods' of yours. >> >>>The same here with the so-called shit I had thrown on >>>ES. Very funny. In reality it was this person who wrote to me that I was >>>a p__. >> >>yes, of course, how stupid of me. it was all Ed's doing, how could I not >>have seen that ? He attacked you, and you, poor thing just suffered >>while he kept on and on and on and on and on and ....... >> >> >>> >>>Again in rgcc I know how to handle this. >> >>Rant on. Those lucky rgcc-ers ..... >> >>> But here I thought such topics >>>were obsolete.... >> >>Bye bye Mr Tauschen ........ >> >>Go spit your venom on rgcc. >> >>Chris Whittington >> >>> >>> >>>Thanks for any reaction by Mr. Schwartz for instance.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.