Author: kurt
Date: 22:54:43 07/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2000 at 00:16:50, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 15, 2000 at 23:50:05, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On July 15, 2000 at 22:12:17, kurt wrote: >> >>>Kramniks win was not a miracle. Just hard work. >>>Juniors loss was the fault of poor opening preparation. >>>Playing against the "Reversed Dutch Stonewall" without >>>an opening guidance against a GM looks impossible for >>>any comp. engines to solve. It took many years for humans >>>to find a proper responce with white colores against it. >>>To avoid future exploitations of such glareingly week >>>openings...engine owners work harder on "Book" to give >>>your engines a better chance to keep winning against GM'S. >>>Best regards, Kurt Widmann >> >>Only guessing, but I would imagine that Amir put a fair amount of effort into >>the Stonewall sections of Junior's book. I'm sure that losses and draws are >>very valuable to him actually. > >Orders of magnitude more valuable than a win. >Err... >Except for sales. Consumers will see little more than won/loss/draw. > >Looking at the succsess rate of A84 with e3-Be2 line...Amir's efforts > are less than fair in my humple opinion.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.