Author: Jeroen Noomen
Date: 01:19:09 07/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2000 at 13:52:39, blass uri wrote: >I think that a better idea is to do only one slow program that can win other >programs by king attacks. King's attacks are only possible in specific positions. In comp-comp games they occur very seldom. So the slowness of the program will cost more points then it will gain points by victorious attacks. >Chess system tal often wins other programs by king attacks but the programmer >stopped to develop this program. It wins a game now and then, but also lose a lot of games. F.e. by unsound sacs or lack of positional understanding, or simply because it is out-searched. Jeroen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.