Author: blass uri
Date: 06:33:10 07/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2000 at 09:28:39, Stephen A. Boak wrote: >>On July 16, 2000 at 09:12:47, blass uri wrote: >> >>Junior has a different opinion and evaluates the position as a clear advantage >>for black(almost a pawn) because of the king safety problems of white. >> >>Uri > >Since black is up one point by material count (traditional) and only up almost a >pawn per your Junior program, why do you say that your Junior scoring is up >almost a pawn *because of* the king safety problems of white? > >Seems to me that black is up a pawn due to material considerations, but per >Junior white must have some small or tiny compensation, since your Junior score >hhas black up *almost a pawn* and not a whole point. The reason is that after the sacrifice when the same material advantage was on the board Junior evaluated the position as close to equal. Something was changed and I guess that it is the king safety. I guess that Junior evaluates the two connected passed pawn of white as more than 2 pawns and I guess also that the difference between two bishops and rook and knight is evaluated as less than two pawns Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.