Author: stuart taylor
Date: 07:56:13 07/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2000 at 07:10:41, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 16, 2000 at 06:53:47, blass uri wrote: > >>I think that not facing GM's in a game is not enough to "prove" that you are of >>GM strength. >> >>You need also not to face IM and other players except players that you know you >>win them in order to "prove" it. > >Yes, but I'm not interested in proving that I'm a GM. I'm just interested in not >refuting my GM strength claim :o). > >>The question about strength of programs if GM's do not know that they play >>against a computer is interesting and can be checked by playing a tournaments >>when nobody knows the opponents. > >There's a lot of possibilities, but very few are interesting and this is one of >them IMHO. > >Best wishes... >Mogens Human playing against human or against machine, may be like two different games completely. Often, someone who is good at one mind game could do quite well in a different mind game if he really studies it well, but that might not always be the case. I hope that clears things up a bit more! The only thing in common might be most of the legal rules, but the actual games and techniques are different rules entirely. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.