Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 06:51:43 11/12/97
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 1997 at 00:35:43, Keith Ian Price wrote: >On November 11, 1997 at 15:18:05, Chris Whittington wrote: > >>Tauschen, you've been engaged in a one year's campaign of giving my >>friend Ed Schroder a load of s***. You pack this in (plus other assorted >>crap), and I talk to you. Otherwise you can go f***-off. Maybe you've >>gone too far already, in which case you'll be going f***-off anyway. >> >>Chris Whittington > >Chris-- > >In this case, Rolf's original post was a compliment to you, concerning >your chess program, and this method of response is what led to the >downgrading of rgcc in the first place. As a native speaker of English, >you know the use of words such as these are unacceptable in a group >where people offended by such language might be reading. I realize that >Rolf has angered you in the past on rgcc, but this isn't rgcc, and to >bring it down to the level of the posts there will simply take away any >reason for its existence. That said, I must agree that Rolf, if he is to >be taken seriously ever again, must stop the constant diatribes against >Ed Shroder in the rgcc, no matter what the history of the conflict. He >has kept it going there. But you started this here, since you used a >deliberate misspelling of his name that I probably made you aware of, >even though without the umlaut it means "to exchange", instead of the >insult you intended. If you do wish to "exchange" unpleasantries with >Rolf, please go to rgcc again to do it, as this group is too difficult >to read with a browser, if there is no advantage such as the elimination >of off-topic posts. I will point out that Rolf, in this case, was >on-topic, until this diversion. Yup. you're right, I went over the top. > >Now that I've said that, I must agree with Rolf's original post that >what you've been able to do with CSTal in 2500-3000 nps on my P150 is >amazing to me. I am really enjoying watching CSTal play. It (He?) is the >first program that really plays like a human to my eye, and thus creates >far more interesting games than my other purchases, even if it loses. It >doesn't do that too often, however, as in the 40/2 tourney I am running >with it against Rebel9, CSTal is currently up 6-2, and uses squeezing >tactics against Rebel9 which is outsearching it by 17-20x: 50000 nps to >2500-3000. > >Please let's get back on topic, Agreed. Will try harder :) Chris Whittington >kp
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.