Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: "Effectively" Comp GM strength question is answered!

Author: Baldomero Garcia, Jr.

Date: 11:56:54 07/16/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 15, 2000 at 06:59:21, Walter Koroljow wrote:

>On July 15, 2000 at 01:35:24, Baldomero Garcia, Jr. wrote:
>
>>Speaking of what "GM strength" means, I think we look at it from today's
>>perspective.  It is no secret that it is far easier to get the GM title
>>today than it was say 10 or 20 years ago (notice that I didn't say it was
>>easy, I said easier).  I remember GM Browne saying that the year he got
>>his GM title, only one other player got it: Karpov.  In those days, the
>>GMs were pretty close to being "world championship contenders".  Today,
>>someone getting a GM title is still far away from being considered a world
>>championship contender.
>>
>>Baldo
>
>Before 1950, no one had run a four-minute mile.  Today, it is nothing special
>and many people do it. Is it easier to do?  I think so.
>
>But the people doing it have to run just as fast as they had to before 1950.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Walter

The analogy is not quite identical.  There is the issue of rating inflation,
which would make it easier to get a GM norm and maitain the required minimum
rating.  Comparing that to your analogy, it would be like making the mile
a little shorter.

Baldo



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.