Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:05:31 07/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 16, 2000 at 20:48:51, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On July 16, 2000 at 19:48:04, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 16, 2000 at 19:41:21, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On July 16, 2000 at 19:32:06, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>On July 16, 2000 at 19:23:04, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>[snip] >>>>>A dual 850MHz!! >>>>>Now that's hilarious. >>>>> >>>> >>>>I realize that there is no comparison but a GM like Khalifman can allow 20 >>>>Minutes per moves and get the same result from a Dual 850 Mhz, instead of >>>>investing $150,000.00 Dollars on a Primergy with 8 X 500 Mhz. >>> >>>True enough, I (as usual) I was a bit over the top again. But the experience of >>>playing chess at 20 minutes per move is not the same as tournament time >>>controls. In a sense, it could be a function of patience. He could buy a $500 >>>machine and let it run all night to choose it's move. >>> >>>If you wait 20 minutes per move, it will take quite a while to finish a game. >> >>In reality you don't need to allow it to play a move every 20 minutes, simply a >>move every 10 minutes will give you almost the same result and still get the >>same amount of training. >> >>Pichard. >> > >I just went to my friend house which is around the corner from me, and I took >Leko vs DJ score sheet and I asked him permission to use his Dual Pentium 850 >Mhz, and I started the game after the opening at move 8. Qf3 (Ruy Lopez Berling >Defense) and so far at move 11 Deep Junior is reproducing exactly every move at >an average of 8 minutes. > Now I am convince that a Dual 850 Mhz is capable of calculating the exact moves using Deep Junior 8.Qf3 h5 9.h3 d5 10.exd5 Bxc3+ 11.bxc3 cxd5 12.Bb3 Qc7 after move 12.. Qc7 I was convinced. In some moves it took 12 minutes, but in other it took only 5 to find the exact moves. >Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.