Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Paris WMCCC - were programs better than in Jakarta (1996)?

Author: Amir Ban

Date: 09:04:42 11/12/97

Go up one level in this thread


On November 12, 1997 at 11:43:33, Bas Hamstra wrote:

>>In my opinion there are a couple of programs around who
>>are able to win such a tournament. You need a strong
>>program but also a bit of luck to be at the very top.
>
>Andreas Mader ran an interesting simulation.
>
>- A mediocre program cannot win a tournament by luck (< 5% chance)
>- The very best program may very well end below the top 3 by pure bad
>luck
> (50% chance) or even below the top 5.
>- Chance that best program wins tournament is only 30%
>
>So one of the toppers will certainly win, but one particularly tipped
>topper willl probably not win.
>
>
>Bas Hamstra.


Something wrong with the mathematics here. Surely this depends on what
the differences in strength are. If the difference between the best and
worst program is 5 ELO points, then they are all basically the same and
everyone has equal chances. If the best is 200 ELO points stronger than
the 2nd best, then he has virtually 100% chances of winning.

Amir



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.