Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Against the Stonewall Attack..

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:44:31 07/16/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 16, 2000 at 01:07:58, Martin Grabriel wrote:

>Against the Stonewall Attack....
>why not just get the program to castle Queenside once the Stonewall pattern
>(white pawns at d4, e3 and f4) is detected? i.e. tweak the evaluation function
>to give more points for a Queenside castling once pattern is detected.
>This is probably how a human opponent would play when faced with the Stonewall
>Attack.
>Just a humble opinion.


That is trivial to do.  Which means it is a mistake.  The safest place in
the Stonewall is right where you start out.  The center is blocked, while
the wings are open.  Going to the queenside makes the attack for white a little
harder to carry out, but if you (black) don't do something active, you can still
get rolled badly.  Just like on the kingside.

In crafty, I simply recognize (a "fuzzy match" using bitmap trickery) the
Stonewall formation and penalize the king for being on the kingside, which
makes white's job harder.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.