Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:37:12 11/12/97
Go up one level in this thread
>The Shredder Paris-Version plays much stronger >than the Jakarta-Version, nevertheless I didn't win >this time :-( Right. 100 to 150 points stronger than Shredder 1 ! I hope the ssdf-guys will be able to test Shredder2 soon on FAST machines. In the moment they test shredder 1 on slow machines. This reminds me on a situation after 1993 when hiarcs .... :-( Ooops. Sorry. >In my opinion there are a couple of programs around who >are able to win such a tournament. You need a strong >program but also a bit of luck to be at the very top. > Right too. I counted with Shredder and Virtual chess. I was not allowed to tell anything about Shredder2, so I said: Virtual is a strong program. Of course "nobody" thought about Junior. Maybe Frederic did. Maybe Frederic did know about Juniors strength for a long time, even before Jakarta ?! I believe there are some reasonable connections between Frederic and the Junior-team. :-) But for us normal people (:-) without much data about Junior, it was NOT easy possible to find out. We could test shredder or virtual against Mchess and Fritz5, but against Junior ? >I think that the level of chess is increasing continiously >from year to year. Some years ago you could play some weak >moves and were still able to win the game. >Today the first bad move loses the game. It is also very difficult >for me to find the mistakes in Shredder's lost games. >I am still not sure where it went wrong in the games against >Junior and Chess Guru. >If somebody can help me plese do so. > >Stefan What about the game against Gandalf and the sac on b5 ? Any comments to this ? I kiebitzed a few times when you looked not very excited about this game ! It was an unbelievable sharp game. Wasn't your queen very near to his king ? How could Gandalf had played Bxb5 ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.