Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 12:36:13 11/12/97
Go up one level in this thread
On November 12, 1997 at 12:33:37, Amir Ban wrote: >On November 12, 1997 at 11:43:33, Bas Hamstra wrote: > > >Something wrong with the mathematics here. Surely this depends on what >the differences in strength are. If the difference between the best and >worst program is 5 ELO points, then they are all basically the same and >everyone has equal chances. If the best is 200 ELO points stronger than >the 2nd best, then he has virtually 100% chances of winning. > >Amir Hi Amir: As I still wait the answers to my interview for CCR :-) let me do a simple question: which is the case for Junior? Is the example of a 200 points stronger or 100 or 50? What do you think of the rating difference between Junior ans Virtual, the second best? Or they were esentially equal but Junios was luckier? Best wishes Fernando
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.