Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Are ChessBase engines the future?

Author: Peter Kappler

Date: 17:33:46 11/12/97

Go up one level in this thread


On November 12, 1997 at 19:47:40, Paul Massie wrote:

>This is just a personal opinion, of course, but as a user who purchases
>a number of packages, and a programmer who has written a lot of code in
>the past, I happen to like the trend toward putting programs in as
>engines in Fritz.  As a user, it gives me a known interface that I like
>and am certain will work.  As a programmer, it allows concentration on
>the interesting part of the work - the chess engine, instead of spending
>a lot of time developing a user interface.  I suspect a huge percentage
>of programmer time is spent on the user interface that the programmers
>would rather spend working on the engine.

I agree completely.  Another nice feature of "plug-in" engines is that
it becomes easy to play matches between different engines.

Does anybody have any information on the Fritz API?  I'd like to modify
my own engine to run under Fritz!

Also, is it safe to assume that when you play Engine X vs. Engine Y that
neither engine is "thinking" while the other is on-move?

--Peter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.