Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I agree with pete galati should know better

Author: Jari Huikari

Date: 12:48:59 07/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 17, 2000 at 15:23:12, Jeroen van Dorp wrote:

>"I agree with pete galati - x should know better"
>"I agree with pete galati -  (however) pete galati should know better"
>"I agree with pete galati - (I) should know better"
>"I agree with y - pete galati should know better"
>
>Who is x? Who is y? *Is* Pete Galati or isn't he? Or is he just a bit Galati?
>
>I'm thoroughly confused by this kind of ambush posting.
>But hey, I suggest the best answer is:
>Pete Galati doesn't know better.

No, no! Brian agrees with Pete Galati. Together they (Brian and Pete) should
know better than Jerry (alone). This is just an example of democracy. Simple,
eh?

					Jari



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.