Author: Jari Huikari
Date: 12:48:59 07/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 17, 2000 at 15:23:12, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >"I agree with pete galati - x should know better" >"I agree with pete galati - (however) pete galati should know better" >"I agree with pete galati - (I) should know better" >"I agree with y - pete galati should know better" > >Who is x? Who is y? *Is* Pete Galati or isn't he? Or is he just a bit Galati? > >I'm thoroughly confused by this kind of ambush posting. >But hey, I suggest the best answer is: >Pete Galati doesn't know better. No, no! Brian agrees with Pete Galati. Together they (Brian and Pete) should know better than Jerry (alone). This is just an example of democracy. Simple, eh? Jari
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.