Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Are ChessBase engines the future?

Author: Keith Ian Price

Date: 21:13:53 11/12/97

Go up one level in this thread


On November 12, 1997 at 17:55:08, Bert Seifriz wrote:

>As most people know now, Junior will come as Fritz/ChessBase engine!
>I have heard from another programmer who will sell his program
>next year as Fritz engine, too.
>This brings the number of available engines to nearly 10!!
>
>Nothing against ChessBase, but I would find it
>very boring when the next WCCC shows only Fritz boards
>on all computers and inside work Hiarcs, Junior, M-Chess,
>Nimzo, Genius, CS-Tal, Rebel etc.
>
>Am I the only person who has a strange feeling about this
>development? Are individual programs not much more colorful?
>Bert

Actually, I like the idea. The unified interface doesn't require a
re-learning of the keystrokes necessary to accomplish each task, the
included database is good, and if they were to add computer-computer
connectivity with error checking, and computer-ICC or FICS connectivity,
I'd be very happy. To rely on an non-upgraded, and obsolete autoplayer
that attepts to interface from the outside is wasting a lot of my time
with interrupted games, and at 40/2 that's a lot of wasted time. I
wouldn't mind the tax for the special cable if there were consistent
upgrades, and better functionality. As far as the argument against
including FICS connectivity is concerned, an unswitchable whisper at the
beginning of a FICS-connected game would prevent cheaters, but allow
people to see the style of the commercial game they are thinking of
buying. A program like CSTal would benefit greatly from this, since its
style is so enjoyable to watch. It would also allow more games against
humans, which so many say they desire.

kp



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.