Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Paris WMCCC - were programs better than in Jakarta (1996)?

Author: Chris Whittington

Date: 05:13:21 11/13/97

Go up one level in this thread



On November 13, 1997 at 07:21:59, Bas Hamstra wrote:

>>>>Amir Ban wrote:
>
>>As for luck, everybody talks about it far too much. A chess game is NOT
>>a random event. When chess programmers talk about luck, they mean that
>>there are some things that they don't want or don't know how to control.
>>Everybody has this problem at some level, but maybe the better programs
>>simply know how to control what their competitors foolishly call luck ?
>
>Ok, then maybe we could invent a new word for the phenomenon that 3
>consecutive tournaments with exactly the same programs give 3 different
>winners. How would you propose to call it?
>
>If you would play tournaments of 1000 rounds, however, it's pretty sure
>the same program wins every time.
>
>To paraphrase Percy agains Blackadder:
>
>So, what's NOT luck, but WORKS like luck. That's a good one mylord...
>

First law of computer chess: there is no such thing as a strongest
computer chess program

Second law of life: chasing holy grails is fun but ultimately pointless

Chris Whittington

>
>
>Bas Hamstra.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.