Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 11:36:00 07/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2000 at 13:39:01, Jerry Adams wrote: > > I doubt if DeepBlue with all it's billions of calculations per second could >score much better than DeepJunior at Dortmund. Seem it is a bad day for the >Advocates of "Hardware is everything" Theory. Deepblue could probally Easily >Defeat DeepJr in a Match, but against humans the story is different. I hope >programmers Continue to Develope Software and not sit back lazily waiting for >Hardware to do all the work. When I saw the thread title I thought you might have gotten the title backwards, since Junior had huge hardware at Dortmund. But then I saw the reference to DB and I said, "Oh, that." I think all that was proven here is that a computer can do well in a tournament with GM's. I haven't looked at all the games, but from the results it seems like the computer belonged in the tournament. That's a big thing. Nothing about DB is proven, because the DB matches were short, Kasparov was stressed, and the computer arrived out of nowhere and vanished without a trace. It could be a lot better or worse than we perceive it now, and we have no practical way of knowing which. Junior at least seems to be willing to come out and play, and I commend Amir for this. The fact is though that Junior was on some great hardware, so I don't know if you are proving your point by bringing up the issue of hardware, or disproving it. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.