Author: Stefan P. Bandriwsky
Date: 15:04:21 07/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2000 at 13:58:51, Ed Schröder wrote: >On July 18, 2000 at 13:36:04, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On July 18, 2000 at 10:55:23, Gordon Rattray wrote: >> >>>I've been holding off buying a new PC until AMD launched it's new chips, etc. >>>I've been reading www.tomshardware.com occassionally. Anyway, now it's time to >>>buy... >>> >>>I want a PC mainly for performing chess analysis, quick results and overnight >>>analysis of positions. >>> >>>Which of these PC specs should I buy? They are all in the price region that I'm >>>looking at. Will there be any significant performance differences? Is there >>>anything else I should be considering? >>> >>>A) PIII 933Mhz, Intel 815e chipset with ICH2(?), 256k L2 cache, 384Mb RAM >>> >>>B) Athlon 1Ghz, Athlon enabled motherboard with 200Mhz bus, 256Mb RAM >>> >>>C) PIII 933Mhz, PIII VIA chipset (133Mhz bus) + AGP Port(?), 256Mb RAM >>> >>>D) PIII 850Mhz with 512k cache, PIII 133 VIA Apollo motherboard, 256Mb PC133 RAM >> >>B is probably your best bet, simply because of the difference in clock speed. >>Clock for clock, the Athlon and the PIII aren't very different. >> >>Depending on which chess program you plan to use, one chip might be better than >>the other. You might consider testing your programs on computers at a store or >>something... But if there is a difference, I'd be surprised if it made up for >>the difference in clock speed. >> >>-Tom > >I have received very good results on Intel's Coppermine. I think its main >reason relies on the fact the L2-cache runs at full speed. The thing even >seems to out-perform the KryoTech. These days I would certainly go for >Intel if the choice is speed. Of course all of this is Rebel related and >I have no clue how other programs perform on the Coppermine. > >Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.