Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 18:18:04 07/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2000 at 21:07:04, Chris Carson wrote: >On July 18, 2000 at 20:03:31, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On July 18, 2000 at 19:51:47, Chris Carson wrote: >> >>>I wonder how much better it would do? >>> >>>8x 700 = 5600 >>>32x 300 = 9600 >>> >>>Just a hypothetical. :) >>> >>>I guess 50 points. Any other known Intel >>>configurations that might yeild better >>>results. Intel anounced a 1000 processor >>>configuration at one time (super computer). >>>I would love to see DJ 6 on that system. >>>I this is at Los Alamos NM. :) >> >>Different technology altogether. I would be very surprised if Deep Junior could >>even run on it. >> >>Do the difference is Strength - 0 = strength. > >I did not say it would work, I said what if. :) > >Try to have a little fun. :) > >Windows 2000 can support 1 to 32 processors. :) Where's the box with 32 CPU's? The only one that matched that description was the Alpha machine, and that project was killed. Quite frankly, I think Deep Junior is running on the fastest machine on earth for that program. >http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/guide/server/features/choosing.asp > >OK, Dann says 0, I say 50 if DJ could get on the >HW. Anyone else? You're really going to have to put it somewhere else. P.Conners is not running on a SMP machine. Call me cantankerous, but as a man from Maine once said to me, "You can't get there from here."
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.