Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 10:05:41 07/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2000 at 19:51:47, Chris Carson wrote: >I wonder how much better it would do? > >8x 700 = 5600 >32x 300 = 9600 > >Just a hypothetical. :) > >I guess 50 points. Any other known Intel >configurations that might yeild better >results. Intel anounced a 1000 processor >configuration at one time (super computer). >I would love to see DJ 6 on that system. >I this is at Los Alamos NM. :) > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson P.ConNerS hardware is not SMP. Any parallel search on it will be less efficient that Deep Junior's parallel search, which is SMP (not to mention the required major rewrite). My guess is that if Deep Junior is rewritten to run on P.ConNerS hardware, it will be just as good as in the eight-way Xeon due to the unavoidable search inefficiencies. I would be more interested to see P.ConNerS running on a Siemens Primergy, of course after it is redesigned to take advantage of it. José.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.