Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 13:08:36 07/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2000 at 12:03:10, Landon Rabern wrote: >When I put this into my program so that >if (attackervalue>DefenderValue)&&(SEE>=0) I keep the move as well, I got worse >results on the WAC test suite. I don't get why you still do the AttackerValue > Defendervalue check when you can simply rely on the SEE result. What about the moves where DefenderValue > AttackerValue but SEE < 0 ? -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.