Author: Chessfun
Date: 17:37:38 07/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2000 at 19:05:50, blass uri wrote: >On July 19, 2000 at 18:52:28, Chessfun wrote: ><snipped> >>They were all made public and the moves could have been be checked, in >>the same way the moves from these games can be. > >I remember that thorsten did not want to check the games because he did not like >the behaviour of faver. As I recall it was a matter of whether he had set up CSTal correctly. And failing Thorsten being specific as to the settings the argument developed from there. But as I recall it was set up correctly. >I also believe that tal is not optimized for matches because it often repeats >the same opening that it lost in the next game and does a different move only >later. > >I know also that tal was one of the winners of the millenium tournament with 9.5 >out of 15 inspite of the fact that it lost the last game because of a bug >when it sacrificed a queen for checkmate and saw too late that it has no >checkmate. > >You can download the games at >http://homepages.compuserve.de/hjsxy/page4.html Already did about 3-4 days ago :-) ><snipped> >>As I said just as public as the previous games were. >>Other than this time, inplace of an autoplayer you have a move >>I assume emailed or played how? at 15 mins per move where there >>is equally as much possability for mistakes to be made. >>Hmmm how long did I let it ponder for?... > >The game of 15 minutes per move against Junior are played with no pondering. >The game were not decided but in one of them tal has a clear advantage. I know I have played them over. Thanks. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.