Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 18:23:31 07/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2000 at 21:15:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 20, 2000 at 19:57:14, Ralf Elvsén wrote: > >>On July 20, 2000 at 18:36:25, Chris Carson wrote: >> >>> >>>1. DT scored 90% against micros from 1988 to 1995. DB is >>> at least 100 times faster than DT and todays fastest >>> micro's have not closed the gap (P6-200 was released >>> in Nov 1997). >>> >> >>I don't want to enter your discussion, just ask a question. >>What was the hardware of DT during this period (88-95)? In particular, >>how did it evolve? >> >>Ralf > > >It evolved every year. New chips. More chips. Better search. Better >evaluation stuff. Better book. Endgame databases included in search. On >and on... just like everybody else. It was _never_ a "static entity" as it >seems everyone thinks... It improved each year like the rest of us. But >they were so far out in front, nobody 'closed the gap'. Even after being >dormant for 3 years, their speed is _still_ so far out in front of everybody >else it isn't funny. We wow over 2M nodes per second on an 8-way SMP box. >DB does that on _one_ chip and is far more efficient on that one chip with >no parallel search overhead. And then they string together 480 of those >things to let them peak at 1B nodes per second and suddenly our 2-2.5M (or my >7M on the alpha last summer) suddenly seems a tad "light"... Yes, when reading CCs posts the only way I could make it all add up was to assume that DT was the same all the time. Oops, better get back into my shell...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.