Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:49:46 07/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 2000 at 21:59:03, Chris Carson wrote: >. Is there some reason why I can't quote DB's MAX NPS? 2M-2.5M is Junior's MAX NPS. It doesn't run that fast all the time. On my quad xeon, 1M is my MAX NPS. I often drop to 1/2 of that. And in endings, to 1/10th of that. Can I quote _my_ MAX to be comparable to what everyone _else_ with a parallel search. Can I quote DB's MAX so that we _all_ speak the same language and we are all consistent? Or should I use their effective number because you like to use the smallest possible number for them and the largest possible number for everybody else? I like consistency. Not arbitrariness. Hsu tries to report the _real_ number of his program. Nobody else does, although I have reported my numbers here many times (approximately 3.2X faster on a quad, on several test suites). Maybe next time you can post something factual, rather than one of your famous contentless "wrong again" posts???
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.