Author: Chris Carson
Date: 04:42:00 07/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2000 at 07:06:08, Alvaro Polo wrote: >On July 21, 2000 at 01:11:57, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On July 20, 2000 at 19:57:16, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>>On July 20, 2000 at 19:11:03, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>[Event "DB-GK the rematch"] >>>>[Site "am Rd1; bm Rf5+"] >>>>[Date "2000.05.31"] >>>>[Round "?"] >>>>[White "DEEP BLUE"] >>>>[Black "Garry Kasparov"] >>>>[Result "0-1"] >>>>[WhiteElo "?"] >>>>[BlackElo "?"] >>>>[FEN "4r3/8/2p2PPk/1p1r4/pP2p1R1/P1B5/2P2K2/8 b - - 0 1"] >>>> >>>>DB played Rd1?? which caused a giant immediate material loss where Rf5+ >>>>is the obvious defence. The most convincing argument is the score DB gave >>>>for Rd1?? way too positive (perhaps Uri remembers) and the very negative >>>>(and correct) scores some of the micro's gave when they did an analysis. >>> >>>Didn't someone say this one was caused by a C macro being improperly expanded or >>>some such? >> >>I don't know and I really don't care. All we have are a few games and >>hiding behind bugs is not a very convincing argument. >> >>Ed > >If what you are seeking is the truth you should care. > >Alvaro The truth is that Ed, Uri, and Amir are right. DB had bugs and a simple eval (so that HSU could put it into ASICS, HSU was a HW guy Murry was the SW guy, trade offs were made to create ASICS). Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.