Author: Chris Carson
Date: 06:47:44 07/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2000 at 08:13:20, blass uri wrote:
>On July 20, 2000 at 20:38:46, Chris Carson wrote:
>
>>http://www.research.ibm.com/deepblue/meet/html/d.3.1.html
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>Chris Carson
>
>I see in the link that IBM decided that the program is Deep blue in february
>1993.
>I believed hyatt that the newspapers were wrong and that Fritz3 won Deep
>thought.
>I see that I was wrong and Fritz3 won Deep blue.
>
>Deep blue has nothing to do with the hardware but with the software of February
>1993.
>The assumption that Deep blue is about hardware of 1996 is wrong by definition
>of IBM.
>
>Uri
Good point, also see:
http://www.research.ibm.com/deepblue/meet/html/d.3.3a.html#same
IBM entered as DB in the WCCC 95. The tournament listed it as
DB and all the books on the subject refer to DB. Dr Hyatt needs
it to be DT (even though it proves nothing) for his silly
argument that DB 97 can beat all of today's programs 90% of the
time. :)
I think Dr Hyatt is emotionally attached to DB for the following
reasons:
1. He got clobbered by DT, so to save face, it must the 100 years
better and billions and billions times faster.
2. He fought for DT to get the Frieken award, thus his reputation
is on the line.
Best Regards,
Chris Carson
Best Regards,
Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.