Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 200 Million NPS in 97 not 1 Billion NPS wrong again (nt)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 08:15:24 07/21/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 21, 2000 at 03:54:59, Amir Ban wrote:

>On July 20, 2000 at 22:49:46, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On July 20, 2000 at 21:59:03, Chris Carson wrote:
>>
>>>.
>>
>>
>>Is there some reason why I can't quote DB's MAX NPS?  2M-2.5M is Junior's
>>MAX NPS.  It doesn't run that fast all the time.
>
>No. 2-2.5 MNPS was typical (and I think it is clear from the KC page that gave
>that number). The highest number I saw was 3.8M.
>
>Amir


It is still "raw" which was my point.  Hsu has factored out the SMP search
overhead nodes from his 200M value, which means his number is not comparable to
ours.

My numbers on the quad xeon go from about 500K to 1.5M.  Raw.  Multiply by
roughly 3.2/4.0 to get an equivalent number to compare to Hsu's...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.