Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 200 Million NPS in 97 not 1 Billion NPS wrong again (nt)

Author: Amir Ban

Date: 08:45:37 07/21/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 21, 2000 at 11:15:24, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On July 21, 2000 at 03:54:59, Amir Ban wrote:
>
>>On July 20, 2000 at 22:49:46, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On July 20, 2000 at 21:59:03, Chris Carson wrote:
>>>
>>>>.
>>>
>>>
>>>Is there some reason why I can't quote DB's MAX NPS?  2M-2.5M is Junior's
>>>MAX NPS.  It doesn't run that fast all the time.
>>
>>No. 2-2.5 MNPS was typical (and I think it is clear from the KC page that gave
>>that number). The highest number I saw was 3.8M.
>>
>>Amir
>
>
>It is still "raw" which was my point.  Hsu has factored out the SMP search
>overhead nodes from his 200M value, which means his number is not comparable to
>ours.
>
>My numbers on the quad xeon go from about 500K to 1.5M.  Raw.  Multiply by
>roughly 3.2/4.0 to get an equivalent number to compare to Hsu's...

I don't care about your point and I'm not involved in this argument. It's just
that you are inventing stuff as you go and I wish you wouldn't do that when
talking about my program.

Thanks.

Amir




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.