Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 10:33:48 07/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2000 at 03:08:09, Ed Schröder wrote: >Are you suggesting 16. c4????? came from a hardware or communication >failure? This is well documented -- you may have it in your r.g.c.c. archives. There's no doubt that Fritz had at least equalized out of the opening, but without the communication failure, the game could have been completely different. >16.c4?? losing a pawn and more. Rebel needs 9 plies and 0:17 to see >16.c4 drop to -1.39 where 16.g3 would hold the position. I presume you refer to today's Rebel? For curiosity's sake, how long does it take the then-current Rebel (but still on today's hardware) to find g3? Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.