Author: Chris Carson
Date: 16:08:01 07/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 21, 2000 at 11:03:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 21, 2000 at 07:42:00, Chris Carson wrote: > >>On July 21, 2000 at 07:06:08, Alvaro Polo wrote: >> >>>On July 21, 2000 at 01:11:57, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On July 20, 2000 at 19:57:16, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 20, 2000 at 19:11:03, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>[Event "DB-GK the rematch"] >>>>>>[Site "am Rd1; bm Rf5+"] >>>>>>[Date "2000.05.31"] >>>>>>[Round "?"] >>>>>>[White "DEEP BLUE"] >>>>>>[Black "Garry Kasparov"] >>>>>>[Result "0-1"] >>>>>>[WhiteElo "?"] >>>>>>[BlackElo "?"] >>>>>>[FEN "4r3/8/2p2PPk/1p1r4/pP2p1R1/P1B5/2P2K2/8 b - - 0 1"] >>>>>> >>>>>>DB played Rd1?? which caused a giant immediate material loss where Rf5+ >>>>>>is the obvious defence. The most convincing argument is the score DB gave >>>>>>for Rd1?? way too positive (perhaps Uri remembers) and the very negative >>>>>>(and correct) scores some of the micro's gave when they did an analysis. >>>>> >>>>>Didn't someone say this one was caused by a C macro being improperly expanded or >>>>>some such? >>>> >>>>I don't know and I really don't care. All we have are a few games and >>>>hiding behind bugs is not a very convincing argument. >>>> >>>>Ed >>> >>>If what you are seeking is the truth you should care. >>> >>>Alvaro >> >>The truth is that Ed, Uri, and Amir are right. DB had bugs >>and a simple eval (so that HSU could put it into ASICS, HSU >>was a HW guy Murry was the SW guy, trade offs were made to >>create ASICS). >> >>Best Regards, >>Chris Carson > > >You are obviously an ASIC expert? I have 11 years working in the ASIC's division at Texas Instruments. I have done a lot of ASIC's designs for customers and produced a lot of ASIC chips. I was working in this field until 15Jun of this year and now TI is paying for my PhD. I have posted this before for you, but I guess you forgot or do not care. Best Regards, Chris Carson > And their claim of 8,000 adjustable eval >terms is therefore bogus? And it was our imagination that it beat Kasparov >3 years ago? > >thought so... > >Nice to have someone that doesn't know anything about hardware declaring what >Hsu could and couldn't do, _after_ he had already done it...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.