Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Towards the minimal post

Author: Chris Carson

Date: 16:53:28 07/21/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 21, 2000 at 18:37:26, Dann Corbit wrote:

>If only we could leave both the subject line *and* the message body blank, we
>could impart our message with even less wasted energy.

Dann,

What did I ever do to you?  Why the attack?  I will assume I am
over reacting and your post is not aimed at me, so my mistake
and sincere apologies.  If I have offended you, then I apologize,
please send me e-mail and we can discuss it off line.  Again,
I sicenerly apologise.  I hope I am mistaken.

I thought that if someone had a short comment, then just use the
one line?  If everyone would prefer for me to re-list a long
post and add only a couple of lines, I can do that.  I thought
the discussion a while ago was to use (nt).

I thought some time back people had voiced that posts were
way to long and to shorten up with (nt) when possible.

If I am violating any CCC rules, please have the moderators
correct me.  If I have offended you then e-mail me.

We have disagreed before, but I do respect your opinion.  I hope
I am allowed to have an opposing one from time to time and not
be labeled just for standing up for myself.

Again, perhaps I am over reacting, but if you are mad at any of
my postings here at CCC, let me know in a private e-mail.  I really
would like to be able to continue a normal posting conversation
with you, but I am not sure if you feel I have over stepped some
bounds where you are concerned.

Thanks again and I sincerly apologize in advance if I have offended
you.

Best Regards,
Chris Carson



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.