Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Are ChessBase engines the future?

Author: Chris Whittington

Date: 01:15:55 11/15/97

Go up one level in this thread



On November 14, 1997 at 21:41:38, Keith Ian Price wrote:

>On November 14, 1997 at 04:04:10, Chris Whittington wrote:
>
>>
>>On November 14, 1997 at 00:59:48, Keith Ian Price wrote:
>>
>>>On November 13, 1997 at 04:44:21, Chris Whittington wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>On November 13, 1997 at 00:13:53, Keith Ian Price wrote:
>>>>>and if they were to add computer-computer
>>>>>connectivity with error checking, and computer-ICC or FICS connectivity,
>>>>>I'd be very happy. To rely on an non-upgraded, and obsolete autoplayer
>>>>>that attepts to interface from the outside is wasting a lot of my time
>>>>>with interrupted games, and at 40/2 that's a lot of wasted time. I
>>>>>wouldn't mind the tax for the special cable if there were consistent
>>>>>upgrades, and better functionality. As far as the argument against
>>>>>including FICS connectivity is concerned, an unswitchable whisper at the
>>>>>beginning of a FICS-connected game would prevent cheaters, but allow
>>>>>people to see the style of the commercial game they are thinking of
>>>>>buying. A program like CSTal would benefit greatly from this,
>>>>
>>>>Just wait for the Windows 98 version ...... :)
>>>>
>>>>Chris Whittington
>>>
>>>Does this mean you will have FICS or ICC access in the Windows version?
>>
>>That's a battle here between me (I want it) and our marketing (who think
>>it will take too long). I might win :) Or might not :(
>
>Windows '98 won't be available to test it on until 3rd quarter, so
>there's plenty of time.
>

We got sent the beta 2 some time ago ...

>>>Or are you talking about including the autoplayer code from Stefan?
>>
>>No, but we'll do that anyway.
>>
>>>Working TASC Smartboard Code would be nice, too, since that's one of the
>>>primary reasons I bought it in the first place, although, since I like
>>>the playing style so much, I am not planning on returning it just
>>>because it doesn't work. Which means that I tested it, but unless there
>>>is a different command line switch than /saitek it doesn't work.
>>
>>If I remember correctly, tasc didn't need a command line, it just
>>autotested at startup to see if the board was there. teh code I did for
>>you should have least have said "tasc board recognised" or soemthign
>>like that .... ?
>
>Nothing like that...   :>(

strange. I guess I'll just have to kill the code off, shame :(

Chris


>kp



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.