Author: Marcos Christensen
Date: 02:31:01 07/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2000 at 00:39:09, blass uri wrote:
>On July 21, 2000 at 16:48:09, Randall Shane wrote:
><snipped>
>>Using the above statement to claim that Deep Blue had a simple evaluation
>>function is a clear misunderstanding of the paragraph's internal and external
>>context. From that statement, all that one can reasonably derive is that Deep
>>Blue has a simpler eval function than the human brain
>
>I think that commercial programs has more complicated evaluation function than
>the human brain.
>
>Humans cannot remmeber many numbers to calculate the evaluation of the position.
>The advnatage of humans is tha ability to use selective search and the ability
>to learn from search to change their evaluation and not more complicated
>evaluation function.
>
>Uri
Than YOUR brain perhaps! Please stop posting bullshit, human brain has +-
100.000.000.000 neuron each one of them has more than 10 thousands of
connections. Compared to human brain chess programs are some kind of "hello
world". I know that this is some kind of obscure club and nobody cares about
your kicks but don't push it too much.
In defense of human brain, your truly
Marcos
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.