Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 23:07:29 07/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2000 at 21:58:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 22, 2000 at 13:41:06, blass uri wrote: > >>[D]r3rk2/1p6/2p3P1/4nP1p/pP2p3/P1B1NbPB/2P5/5RK1 w - - 0 1 >> >>Deeeper blue planned to go to this position in move 37 but did not do it >> >>at depth 7(6) after 3 seconds it planned to play Rd8-a8 in order to get this >>position with evaluation of -24 >> >>Rd8-a8 failed low at depth 8(6) and deeper blue got evaluation of -54 >> >>Deeper blue solved the fail low problem with evaluation of -98 and changed its >>mind to another move b5 with clearly better evaluation. >> >>It is interesting to compare evaluation of programs after b5(the move that was >>played) and after Rd8-a8 the move that was not played to see if Deeper blue had >>a good reason to fail low. >> >>Uri > >I tried both ways. The score is pretty close to the same either way. After >b5, my score is -.8 after 15 plies. After Rad8 Uri posted the position AFTER DB would have played Rda8. The original position should've been this: [D]3rrk2/1p6/2p3P1/4nP1p/pP2p3/P1B1NbPB/2P5/5RK1 b - - 0 1 Then to search 37. ...b5 and 37. ...Rda8 and compare the scores.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.