Author: blass uri
Date: 03:08:16 07/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 23, 2000 at 01:52:40, David Blackman wrote: >On July 22, 2000 at 06:26:06, Marcos Christensen wrote: > > >> So I belive that this is a case of Internet Hoax! A bunch of GMs locked in >>a room played Kasparov. Prove me wrong!! > >Have you ever seen a bunch of GMs analysing together? Can you imagine them >actually agreeing what move to make fast enough to make a normal time control? >And if they did manage it, would their moves be any good? Probably not, because >they'd quickly get into a position that wasn't the kind of position most of them >play. > >One GM in a room is unlikely to beat Kasparov in a match. That's because >Kasparov is the best human player there is. A bunch of GM's in a room would be >much worse. I do not believe the story about GM's but I believe that a team of GM's can be better than one of them if they work in the right way. They can decide before the game that one of them is the boss and this GM will have the final word about moves. If this GM does not want other to help then they will say nothing. One GM in a room also has good chances to beat kasparov. Kasparov assumed that he plays against a computer and he can beat every GM when he knows the opponent but when he does not know the opponent and believes that he is playing a computer the result may be different. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.