Author: stuart taylor
Date: 11:28:23 07/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 2000 at 12:43:44, Andrew Dados wrote: >On July 22, 2000 at 12:23:05, Marcos Christensen wrote: > >> >> The original post were deleted by evil forces. But I will repost something, >>these thing are long time ventiled in internet but no one has courage to post >>them. I know i will suffer for this but... who cares anyway! >> >> >> >> >> In this post I said that Never existed Deep Blue, its all an conspiration to >>make YOU belive that such thing existed some day. >> >> >> 1) We don't know his name, when I thought it was deep blue, no! It was Deep >>Thought, When I thought it was Deep Blue, wrong again it was Deeper Blue, or >>Deep Blue II. >> 2) We don't know how many nps it performs, when I believe it was 8M. NO! It >>was 2M. When I accept it was 200M, wrong again, it was 1Billion >> 3) When it loses it because some arcane macro expansion bug or better >>communication breakdown. >> 4) It is supposed to have an author, if is not the case that we will discover >>later that it assembled itself, but he never manifests. >> 5) The logs files are some kind of hierogliphes, no one knows how many ply >>it searched looking at the logs. Surely a phd work! >> 6) There was a deep blue junior that played like gnuchess. But was some kind >>of crippled version, so does not count! >> 7) It looks like is there a book somewhere, but no one is able to read (only >>two persons can, in fact). >> 8) There were a promise of a Deep Blue card but... >> 10) No one never saw deep blue. They only saw a monitor. >> So I belive that this is a case of Internet Hoax! A bunch of GMs locked in >>a room played Kasparov. Prove me wrong!! >> Deep Blue never existed, is a internet hoax like Good Times virus. >> >> Kind Regards >> Marcos > >FYI: Good Times virus is not a hoax (thanks to MS Outlook, as most email >viruses): http://www.msnbc.com/news/432208.asp?cp1=1#BODY > >-Andrew- I was wondering, since this post seems to have brought quite some attention, if Marcos is saying something which is plausible.As I can't understand all his technical(?) conepts, and one or two people seem to be answering seriously etc. Can it really be possible that it (DB) was all a hoax? such a claim seems to defy reality and human nature and common sense to the extreme! S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.